View the archives


Search the archives

Archive for the 'quotes' Category

Xi internet never forgets

Tuesday, March 20th, 2018

President’s Xi Jinping’s plan to construct a social credit system based on the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted”

Reuters, from China to bar people with bad ‘social credit’ from planes, trains [].

This is worse than the The Internet Never Forgets [].

Penis Facial

Monday, March 19th, 2018

It’s not really called a “penis facial”. On the company website, it goes by a far more palatable name: the Hollywood EGF facial. It involves a cleanse, an intensive TCA peel, micro-needling, an electrifying mask, and, finally, FDA-approved Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) serum.

“EGF is derived from the progenitor cells of the human fibroblast taken from Korean newborn baby foreskin – which helps to generate collagen and elastin,” Louise explains. So the EGF used in the treatment comes from skin cells produced in a lab.

Rosie McCall, in “Penis Facials” Are Hollywood’s Favorite New Beauty Trend, Yes Really []We are literally one step short of bathing in the blood of virgins… thank you Hollywood.

Beef and a Chief

Saturday, January 27th, 2018

“Whenever Trump wanted, he would command “Beef and a chief!” in his bathrobe, and his staff would have to get him a little bit of meat.”

Botnik AI rewrite of Fire and Fury []

Personal Data Law

Friday, January 19th, 2018

The Economist cover story this week is on Taming the Titans, by which they mean the new titans of Google, Facebook and Amazon. They talk about how these players could be regulated to avoid the abuse of monopolies and they make a nice comparison between how we deal with Intellectual Property and how we could deal with Personal Data:

Just as America drew up sophisticated rules about intellectual property in the 19th century, so it needs a new set of laws to govern the ownership and exchange of data, with the aim of giving solid rights to individuals.

The Economist, How to Tame the Tech Titans []

We have personal data laws in many places but the comparison to IP is a good one (despite the myriad problems with out-of-date IP law…)

The Faces of Copyright

Tuesday, October 24th, 2017

Another case of IP law needing to be updated for the computer age…

Someone is suing movie studios over the copyright to characters which were created using facial contour mapping of actors onto CGI faces. the defence is arguing that this would be equivilant to Microsoft owning the copyright text written in Word or Adobe owning images made with Photoshop. of course the plaintiff disagrees:

”Generally, an author writes a book by typing every word into a Word document, and an artist creates a work of art by deciding on specific treatment of every pixel in a Photoshop file,” continues the brief. “But in neither case does their work provide input to software that synthesizes an original expression that is distinct from the author’s or artist’s input. … The core distinction between defendants’ analogies and the MOVA Contour program is the degree to which the output is the product of the effort of the program’s user versus the program itself. Where the program does the ‘lion’s share of the work’ in creating the output — as the complaint alleges the MOVA Contour program does here — the copyright in the output belongs to the programmer, not the end-user or the director.”

Lawyers of Rearden LLC in their brief as quoted in Hollywood Confronts a Copyright Argument With Potential for Mass Disruption [].<\cite>

I don’t buy the argument on grounds of common sense. The idea that the computer does the “Lion’s share of the work” crunching numbers implies that the binary math the CPU does, as instructed, is more valuable than all the other work done to produce a blockbuster film, or the work of the actor behind the CGI, stikes seems absurd. Computer programs do the Lion’s share of the work in so many aspects of the modern world.

Programers make programs to do things, people use the programs to do those things. If he wins then programer will own the world.