CategoriesArchiveSearchRandom
View the archives

or

Search the archives
 

R.I.P. Dad

October 28th, 2017

Goodbye and thanks for everything, I would not be here and I would not be who I am without you.

The Faces of Copyright

October 24th, 2017

Another case of IP law needing to be updated for the computer age…

Someone is suing movie studios over the copyright to characters which were created using facial contour mapping of actors onto CGI faces. the defence is arguing that this would be equivilant to Microsoft owning the copyright text written in Word or Adobe owning images made with Photoshop. of course the plaintiff disagrees:

”Generally, an author writes a book by typing every word into a Word document, and an artist creates a work of art by deciding on specific treatment of every pixel in a Photoshop file,” continues the brief. “But in neither case does their work provide input to software that synthesizes an original expression that is distinct from the author’s or artist’s input. … The core distinction between defendants’ analogies and the MOVA Contour program is the degree to which the output is the product of the effort of the program’s user versus the program itself. Where the program does the ‘lion’s share of the work’ in creating the output — as the complaint alleges the MOVA Contour program does here — the copyright in the output belongs to the programmer, not the end-user or the director.”

Lawyers of Rearden LLC in their brief as quoted in Hollywood Confronts a Copyright Argument With Potential for Mass Disruption [hollywoodreporter.com].<\cite>

I don’t buy the argument on grounds of common sense. The idea that the computer does the “Lion’s share of the work” crunching numbers implies that the binary math the CPU does, as instructed, is more valuable than all the other work done to produce a blockbuster film, or the work of the actor behind the CGI, stikes seems absurd. Computer programs do the Lion’s share of the work in so many aspects of the modern world.

Programers make programs to do things, people use the programs to do those things. If he wins then programer will own the world. 

Now is the time

October 5th, 2017

Sorry Mitch McConnell, there is no more appropriate time to discuss legislative solutions to the material failure of current US laws to protect Americans from gun violence. Congress does not need time to mourn, it needs to debate and legislate.

Politicians just continue to dodge the issue:

“Entirely premature to be discussing about legislative solutions if any,”

Mitch McConnell, speaking in the aftermath of the shootings in Las Vegas, from McConnell swats away talk of gun control [politico.com]

Rural Broadband Revisited

September 29th, 2017

Just watched this video…

It reminded me that I posted the same idea [confusion.cc] back in 2010. the idea that we should use the framework of the rural electrification act to promote broadband expansion in low density places.

And not much has changed in the interceeding 7 years. Based on the 4G wireless coverage map in the video it would seem that maybe my mobile work work on my grandparents farm. So, I guess that’s progress.

It would be sad if the government does scale back their definition of broadband to 4G speeds and just declare victory and move on. I still think that high speed data is as important as roads and power to the modern world (I’m not going to mention water – it’s already on the “required for life” list) and the government has a key role in making sure this infrastructure reaches all its citizens. Rural co-ops still seem, to me, to be the best model based on things already proven to work.

If you’re good at it you deserve a medal

September 27th, 2017

“Adulthood is kind of like the Olympics where the main event is trying not to fall apart under the weight of your own ennui”

Rae Paoletta in “Screaming Hairy Armadillos Articulate Our Existential Dread” [gizmodo.com] on Gizmodo.com